COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT TERMS USING MINIIMPLANTS SKELETAL ANCHORAGE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-7684/2025-4-15

Keywords:

miniimplant, orthodontic treatment, mesialization of molars, bracket system

Abstract

Introduction. The duration of orthodontic treatment is an important factor that serves as a criterion for assessing its quality and one of the determining factors for the success of treatment. The aim of the study. To compare the duration of orthodontic treatment in patients with the use of mini-implants and without the use of additional bone anchorage. Materials and methods. For orthodontic treatment, we selected 62 individuals who had defects in the posterior part of the dentition on the lower jaw (absence of the first permanent molar on one or both sides of the lower jaw), who were planned to undergo mesialization of the second and third permanent molars in order to replace the dentition defect with their own teeth. The first group included 32 individuals, and the second group included 30 individuals. The duration of orthodontic treatment was determined from the moment of installation of the bracket system to the moment of its removal and transition to the retention period of treatment. The results. The terms of complex treatment of dental patients with mesialization of molars differed in the two comparative study groups. In group I using orthodontic miniimplants as anchorage supports, the average duration of treatment was 2.19±0.05 years. In the second study group, in which mesialization of teeth was performed without the use of intraosseous anchorage, the average duration of treatment was 2.92±0.04 years. Thus, the treatment terms in the first study group using miniimplant-borne anchorage were reduced by 8.8±0.12 months compared to the second group (p<0.001). Conclusion. The obtained results indicate that the use of orthodontic miniimplants as anchorage supports during the lower molars mesialization contributes to the reduction of the overall terms of orthodontic treatment.

References

Chugh T, Ganeshkar S, Revankar A, Jain A. Quantitative assessment of interradicular bone density in the maxilla and mandible: implications in clinical orthodontics. Progress in Orthodontics. 2013;14(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-38

Lee D, Park J, Bay R, Choi S, Chae J. Cortical bone thickness and bone density effects on miniscrew success rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research. 2021;24(1):92-102. doi:10.1111/ocr.12453

Rivis OIu, Potapchuk AM, Goncharuk-Khomyn MIu, Bokoch AV. Use of mini-implant anchorage for second molar mesialization: comprehensive approach for treatment efficiency analysis. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada. 2020;20:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2020.018

Pinto A, Alves L, Maltz M, Susin C, Zenkner J. Does the Duration of Fixed Orthodontic Treatment Affect Caries Activity among Adolescents and Young Adults? Caries Research. 2018 Apr; 52(6):463-467. doi: 10.1159/000488209

Abbing A, Koretsi V, Eliades T, Papageorgiou S. Duration of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in adolescents and adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Progress in Orthodontics. 2020 Oct;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00334-4.

Mavreas D, Athanasiou A. Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008 Aug; 30(4): 386-395. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn018

Yassir Y, McIntyre G, Bearn D. Orthodontic treatment and root resorption: an overview of systematic reviews. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2021 Aug; 43(4): 442-456. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa058

Kostenko EYa, Melnyk VS, Gorzov LF. The influence of fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal tissues (literature review). Young scientist. 2016;12:311–315.

Bilodeau J. A “midline dilemma” in an adult mutilated dentition. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2014;146:364-370. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.025.

Valarelli F, Brito M, Cancado R, Freitas K. Lower-Molar Distalization with Mini-Implant Anchorage in Asymmetrical Class II Cases. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2017;51(2):86-94.

Pimentel A, Manzi M, Barbosa A, Cotrim-Ferreira F, Carvalho P, Lima G, Deboni M. Mini-Implant Screws for Bone- Borne Anchorage: A Biomechanical In Vitro Study Comparing Three Diameters. Internal Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2016;31(5):1072-1076. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4390.

Librizzi Z, Janakiraman N, Rangiani A, Nanda R, Uribe F. Targeted Mechanics for Limited Posterior Treatment with Mini-Implant Anchorage. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2015;49(12):777-783.

Potapchuk AM, Rivis OYu. Treatment of dentoalveolar anomalies using miniimplant-borne skeletal anchorage (litarature review). Visnyk stomatolohiii. 2013; 3(84):100-102.

Chatzigianni A, Keilig L, Reimann S, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2011 Aug;33(4):381-387. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq088

Guillaume B. Dental implants: A review. Morphologie. 2016;100(331):189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2016.02.002.

Vicioni-Marques F, Pimentel D, Matsumoto M, Stuani M, Romano F. Orthodontic mini-implants: clinical and peri-implant evaluation. 2022 Feb;11(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.11.001.

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

DENTISTRY